Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817641›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Identification of key odorants in honeysuckle by headspace-solid phase microextraction and solvent-assisted flavour evaporation with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatograph-olfactometry in combination with chemometrics.

Keran Su, Xin Zhang, Shao Quan Liu, LiHui Jia, Benjamin Lassabliere, Kim Huey Ee, Aileen Pua, Rui Min Vivian Goh, Jingcan Sun, Bin Yu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Honeysuckle as a Bio-Enhancer inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Fractionating the Flavonoids inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keran SuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Xin ZhangKey Laboratory for Green Chemical Process of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone, Wuhan, China.
Shao Quan LiuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
LiHui JiaKey Laboratory for Green Chemical Process of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone, Wuhan, China.
Benjamin LassabliereMane SEA Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Kim Huey EeMane SEA Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Aileen PuaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Rui Min Vivian GohDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jingcan SunMane SEA Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Bin YuMane SEA Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3867-5447
XiaoXue HuHubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
National University of Singapore · SGWuhan Institute of Technology · CNHubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, the identification of honeysuckle aroma depends on experienced tasters, which results in inconsistencies due to human error. The key odorants have the potential to distinguish the different species and evaluate the quality of honeysuckle. Hence, in this study, a more scientific approach was applied to distinguish various honeysuckles. The volatile compounds of different species and parts of honeysuckle were separately extracted by headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and solvent assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE). Compounds with greater volatility such as aldehydes, limonene, γ-terpinene, and terpinolene were preferentially extracted by HS-SPME. As a complementary extraction method to HS-SPME, SAFE was found to recover comparatively more polar compounds such as eugenol, decanoic acid, and vanillin. Subsequently, key odorants with the highest flavour dilution (FD) factors were detected by aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA). These were benzaldehyde, 4-ethylphenol, decanoic acid, vanillin, 3-methyl-2-butenal, and β-ionone in honeysuckle flowers and γ-octalactone, 4-ethyl phenol, and vanillin in honeysuckle stem. Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to analyze not only the key odorants of species and parts of honeysuckle but also their different origins. The results of PCA suggested that the species of honeysuckle contributed much more to variations in aroma rather than their origins. In conclusion, the application of the key odorants combined with PCA was demonstrated as a valid approach to differentiate species, origins, and parts of honeysuckle.

Indexed as

Gas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryLoniceraOdorantsOlfactometrySolid Phase MicroextractionSolventsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID32817641
PMCPMC7440650
OpenAlexW3080364054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.