Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817597›Full record

ArticleMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2020

Mass Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in 16 Prisons and Jails - Six Jurisdictions, United States, April-May 2020.

Liesl M Hagan, Samantha P Williams, Anne C Spaulding, Robin L Toblin, Jessica Figlenski, Jeanne Ocampo, Tara Ross, Heidi Bauer, Justine Hutchinson, Kimberley D Lucas and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 Reproduction Numbers and Long COVID Prevalences in California State Prisons.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Dynamic Contact Networks of Residents of an Urban Jail in the Era of SARS-CoV-2.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission between and into California state prisons.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. COVID-19 Burden in Adult Correctional or Detention Facilities and the Surrounding Communities, January 1, 2020-July 20, 2021.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Liesl M Hagan
Samantha P Williams
Anne C Spaulding
Robin L Toblin
Jessica Figlenski
Jeanne Ocampo
Tara Ross
Heidi Bauer
Justine Hutchinson
Kimberley D Lucas
Matthew Zahn
Chun Chiang
Timothy Collins
Alexis Burakoff
Juli Bettridge
Ginger Stringer
Randolph Maul
Kristen Waters
Courtney Dewart
Jennifer Clayton
Sietske de Fijter
Radha Sadacharan
Linda Garcia
Naomi Lockett
Kirstin Short
Laxman Sunder
Senad Handanagic

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in correctional and detention facilities* can be challenging because of population-dense housing, varied access to hygiene facilities and supplies, and limited space for isolation and quarantine (1). Incarcerated and detained populations have a high prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing their risk for severe COVID-19-associated illness and making early detection critical (2,3). Correctional and detention facilities are not closed systems; SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can be transmitted to and from the surrounding community through staff member and visitor movements as well as entry, transfer, and release of incarcerated and detained persons (1). To better understand SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in these settings, CDC requested data from 15 jurisdictions describing results of mass testing events among incarcerated and detained persons and cases identified through earlier symptom-based testing. Six jurisdictions reported SARS-CoV-2 prevalence of 0%-86.8% (median = 29.3%) from mass testing events in 16 adult facilities. Before mass testing, 15 of the 16 facilities had identified at least one COVID-19 case among incarcerated or detained persons using symptom-based testing, and mass testing increased the total number of known cases from 642 to 8,239. Case surveillance from symptom-based testing has likely underestimated SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in correctional and detention facilities. Broad-based testing can provide a more accurate assessment of prevalence and generate data to help control transmission (4).

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrisonsClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDisease OutbreaksHousingHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32817597
PMCPMC7439979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.