Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817564›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

A method for scoring the cell type-specific impacts of noncoding variants in personal genomes.

Wenran Li, Zhana Duren, Rui Jiang, Wing Hung Wong

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging cell-type-specific regulatory networks to interpret genetic variants in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenran LiDepartment of Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Zhana DurenDepartment of Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Rui JiangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Research Department of Bioinformatics at the Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China ruijiang@tsinghua.edu.cn whwong@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-3753
Wing Hung WongDepartment of Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; ruijiang@tsinghua.edu.cn whwong@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Special EquipmentP50HG007735 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y · 2014 to 2018
$15.2M
Center for Personal Dynamic RegulomesRM1HG007735 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y · 2019 to 2023
$13.8M
Statistical methods for gene regulatory analysis and single cell genomicsR01HG010359 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, WING H. · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG007735NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010359NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG007735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A person's genome typically contains millions of variants which represent the differences between this personal genome and the reference human genome. The interpretation of these variants, i.e., the assessment of their potential impact on a person's phenotype, is currently of great interest in human genetics and medicine. We have developed a prioritization tool called OpenCausal which takes as inputs 1) a personal genome and 2) a reference context-specific TF expression profile and returns a list of noncoding variants prioritized according to their impact on chromatin accessibility for any given genomic region of interest. We applied OpenCausal to 6,430 samples across 18 tissues derived from the GTEx project and found that the variants prioritized by OpenCausal are highly enriched for eQTLs and caQTLs. We further propose a strategy to integrate the predicted open scores with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data to prioritize putative causal variants and regulatory elements for a given risk locus (i.e., fine-mapping analysis). As an initial example, we applied this method to a GWAS dataset of human height and found that the prioritized putative variants and elements are correlated with the phenotype (i.e., heights of individuals) better than others.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenetic VariationGenome, HumanModels, GeneticRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalBody HeightGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansQuantitative Trait LociSoftwareTranscription FactorsTranscription Factorsfine-mapping analysisGWASnoncoding variantspersonal genomeregression model

Identifiers

PMID32817564
PMCPMC7474608
OpenAlexW3063428689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.