Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817455›Full record

ArticlemSphere2020

Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality.

Catherine Putonti, Jason W Shapiro, Adriana Ene, Oleksandra Tsibere, Alan J Wolfe

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probiotic and Postbiotic Interactions ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Pangenome analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Cervicovaginal microbial features predictInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  5. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Draft genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  9. Substances Secreted byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine PutontiDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA cputonti@luc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-5991
Jason W ShapiroDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-8418
Adriana EneBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Oleksandra TsibereDepartment of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alan J WolfeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-0545

Funding

The Female Urinary Microbiome and Urinary IncontinenceR01DK104718 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA, WOLFE, ALAN J · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli are dominant members of the "healthy" female urogenital microbiota. One of these species,

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsPhylogenyDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansLactobacillusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityVaginaDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SLactobacillusLactobacillus jenseniiLactobacillus mulierisurinary microbiomeurogenital microbiome

Identifiers

PMID32817455
PMCPMC7426171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.