Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817373›Full record

ArticleScience signaling2020

Kinetics of receptor tyrosine kinase activation define ERK signaling dynamics.

Anatoly Kiyatkin, Iris K van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh, Daryl E Klein, Mark A Lemmon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science signaling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of kinase domain dimerization in EGFR activation.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-Molecule FRET-Tracking of InlB-Activated MET Receptors in Living Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Phlorotannins fromMarine drugs · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anatoly KiyatkinDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5060-6081
Iris K van Alderwerelt van RosenburghDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Daryl E KleinDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Mark A LemmonDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. mark.lemmon@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-5319
Yale Cancer Center · US

Funding

PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
Systems analysis of phenotypic switch in control of cancer invasionU54CA209992 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVCHENKO, ANDRE · 2016 to 2021
$10.1M
Understanding EGF receptor activation by growth factors and oncogenic mutationsR01CA198164 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FERGUSON, KATHRYN M, LEMMON, MARK A · 2015 to 2024
$5.2M
Harnessing receptor pleiotropy to control cancerK22CA215821 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, DARYL EWALD · 2017 to 2019
$430k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA215821NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198164NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In responses to activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), crucial cell fate decisions depend on the duration and dynamics of ERK signaling. In PC12 cells, epidermal growth factor (EGF) induces transient ERK activation that leads to cell proliferation, whereas nerve growth factor (NGF) promotes sustained ERK activation and cell differentiation. These differences have typically been assumed to reflect distinct feedback mechanisms in the Raf-MEK-ERK signaling network, with the receptors themselves acting as simple upstream inputs. We failed to confirm the expected differences in feedback type when investigating transient versus sustained signaling downstream of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and NGF receptor (TrkA). Instead, we found that ERK signaling faithfully followed RTK dynamics when receptor signaling was modulated in different ways. EGFR activation kinetics, and consequently ERK signaling dynamics, were switched from transient to sustained when receptor internalization was inhibited with drugs or mutations, or when cells expressed a chimeric receptor likely to have impaired dimerization. In addition, EGFR and ERK signaling both became more sustained when substoichiometric levels of erlotinib were added to reduce duration of EGFR kinase activation. Our results argue that RTK activation kinetics play a crucial role in determining MAP kinase cascade signaling dynamics and cell fate decisions, and that signaling outcome can be modified by activating a given RTK in different ways.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationEnzyme ActivationEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansKineticsMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMCF-7 CellsNerve Growth FactorPC12 CellsRatsRNA InterferenceEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesNerve Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID32817373
PMCPMC7521189
OpenAlexW3061431577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.