ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2020
An acute seizure prior to memory reactivation transiently impairs associative memory performance in C57BL/6J mice.
Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A flurothyl-induced seizure does not disrupt hippocampal memory reconsolidation in C57BL/6 J mice.Epilepsy research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory deficits significantly decrease an individual's quality of life and are a pervasive comorbidity of epilepsy. Despite the various distinct processes of memory, the majority of epilepsy research has focused on seizures during the encoding phase of memory, therefore the effects of a seizure on other memory processes is relatively unknown. In the present study, we investigated how a single seizure affects memory reactivation in C57BL/6J adult mice using an associative conditioning paradigm. Initially, mice were trained to associate a tone (conditioned stimulus), with the presence of a shock (unconditioned stimulus). Flurothyl was then administered 1 h before, 1 h after, or 6 h before a memory reactivation trial. The learned association was then assessed by presenting a conditioned stimulus in a new context 24 h or 1 wk after memory reactivation. We found that mice receiving a seizure 1 h prior to reactivation exhibited a deficit in memory 24 h later but not 1 wk later. When mice were administered a seizure 6 h before or 1 h after reactivation, there were no differences in memory between seizure and control animals. Altogether, our study indicates that an acute seizure during memory reactivation leads to a temporary deficit in associative memory in adult mice. These findings suggest that the cognitive impact of a seizure may depend on the timing of the seizure relative to the memory process that is active.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.