Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817245›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Cerebellar Theta and Beta Noninvasive Stimulation Rhythms Differentially Influence Episodic Memory versus Semantic Prediction.

Shruti Dave, Stephen VanHaerents, Joel L Voss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shruti DaveDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611 shruti.dave@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-7802
Stephen VanHaerentsDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-4414
Joel L VossDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.ORCID 0000-0003-4180-9335
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Noninvasive Manipulation of Hippocampal-Cortical Brain Networks and MemoryR01MH106512 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI VOSS, JOEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Optimizing noninvasive modulation of prediction and episodic memory networks via cerebellar stimulationF32MH118718 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DAVE, SHRUTI · 2018 to 2021
$234k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH118718NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human cerebellum is thought to interact with distributed brain networks to support cognitive abilities such as episodic memory and semantic prediction. Hippocampal and fronto-temporo-parietal networks that respectively support episodic memory versus semantic prediction have been associated with distinct endogenous oscillatory activity frequency bands: theta (∼3-8 Hz) versus beta (∼13-30 Hz) respectively. We sought to test whether it is possible to toggle cerebellar participation in episodic memory versus semantic prediction by noninvasively stimulating with theta versus beta rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation. In human subjects of both sexes, cerebellar theta stimulation improved episodic memory encoding but did not influence neural signals of semantic prediction, whereas beta stimulation of the same cerebellar location increased neural signals of semantic prediction but did not influence episodic memory encoding. This constitutes evidence for double dissociation of cerebellar contributions to semantic prediction versus episodic memory based on stimulation rhythm, supporting the hypothesis that the cerebellum can be biased to support these distinct cognitive abilities at the command of network-specific rhythmic activity.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmMemory, EpisodicSemanticsTheta RhythmAdolescentAdultCerebellumFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationbeta frequencyEEGepisodic memorylanguage processingtheta frequencytranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32817245
PMCPMC7534910
OpenAlexW3053732297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.