Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817120›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Milena M Milosevic, Jinyoung Jang, Eric J McKimm, Mei Hong Zhu, Srdjan D Antic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A red-emitting carborhodamine for monitoring and measuring membrane potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milena M MilosevicInstitute for Systems Genomics, Department of Neuroscience, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-6766
Jinyoung JangInstitute for Systems Genomics, Department of Neuroscience, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030.
Eric J McKimmInstitute for Systems Genomics, Department of Neuroscience, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030.
Mei Hong ZhuInstitute for Systems Genomics, Department of Neuroscience, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030.
Srdjan D AnticInstitute for Systems Genomics, Department of Neuroscience, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030 antic@uchc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-4710

Funding

Near Infrared Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators (NIR-GEVIs) for All-Optical Electrophysiology (AOE)U01NS099573 · NINDS · IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE · PI ANTIC, SRDJAN D, KNOPFEL, THOMAS · 2016 to 2018
$2.9M
Sparse, Strong and Large Area Targeting of Genetically Encoded IndicatorsU01MH109091 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ANTIC, SRDJAN D, KNOPFEL, THOMAS · 2015 to 2017
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109091NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) could potentially be used for mapping neural circuits at the plane of synaptic potentials and plateau potentials-two blind spots of GCaMP-based imaging. In the last year alone, several laboratories reported significant breakthroughs in the quality of GEVIs and the efficacy of the voltage imaging equipment. One major obstacle of using well performing GEVIs in the pursuit of interesting biological data is the process of transferring GEVIs between laboratories, as their reported qualities (e.g., membrane targeting, brightness, sensitivity, optical signal quality) are often difficult to reproduce outside of the laboratory of the GEVI origin. We have tested eight available GEVIs (Archon1, ArcLightD, ASAP1, ASAP2s, ASAP3b, Bongwoori-Pos6, FlicR1, and chi-VSFP-Butterfly) and two voltage-sensitive dyes (BeRST1 and di-4-ANEPPS). We used the same microscope, lens, and optical detector, while the light sources were interchanged. GEVI voltage imaging was attempted in the following three preparations: (1) cultured neurons, (2) HEK293 cells, and (3) mouse brain slices. Systematic measurements were successful only in HEK293 cells and brain slices. Despite the significant differences in brightness and dynamic response (ON rate), all tested indicators produced reasonable optical signals in brain slices and solid

Indexed as

ButterfliesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLuminescent ProteinsNeuronsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingASAP1 protein, humanLuminescent ProteinsArchon1ArcLightASAP3bBeRST1BongwooriFlicR1VSFP Butterfly

Identifiers

PMID32817120
PMCPMC7540930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.