Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817094›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2020

A Compass To Boost Navigation: Cell Biology of Bacterial Magnetotaxis.

Frank D Müller, Dirk Schüler, Daniel Pfeiffer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Magnetotaxis in an anaerobic ciliate via tripartite syntrophy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Inside theNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bacterial Organelles in Iron Physiology.Molecular microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Magnetosome Protein, Mms6 fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank D MüllerDepartment of Microbiology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany frank.mueller@uni-bayreuth.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-3729
Dirk SchülerDepartment of Microbiology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-0762
Daniel PfeifferDepartment of Microbiology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1401-533X
University of Bayreuth · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria are aquatic or sediment-dwelling microorganisms able to take advantage of the Earth's magnetic field for directed motility. The source of this amazing trait is magnetosomes, unique organelles used to synthesize single nanometer-sized crystals of magnetic iron minerals that are queued up to build an intracellular compass. Most of these microorganisms cannot be cultivated under controlled conditions, much less genetically engineered, with only few exceptions. However, two of the genetically amenable

Indexed as

Taxis ResponseBacterial ProteinsChemotaxisCytoskeletonFerrosoferric OxideFlagellaMagnetosomesMagnetospirillumBacterial ProteinsFerrosoferric Oxidecell shapecytoskeletonflagellamagnetoskeletonmagnetosomemagnetospirillummagnetotaxis

Identifiers

PMID32817094
PMCPMC7549360
OpenAlexW3075036400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.