Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816916›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Assessment of the Potential for Genomic Selection To Improve Husk Traits in Maize.

Zhenhai Cui, Haixiao Dong, Ao Zhang, Yanye Ruan, Yan He, Zhiwu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenhai CuiCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, Shenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7619-9456
Haixiao DongDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-488X
Ao ZhangCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, Shenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-2181
Yanye RuanCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, Shenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Yan HeNational Maize Improvement Center of China, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100094, China yh352@cau.edu.cn zhiwu.zhang@wsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-8502
Zhiwu ZhangDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164 yh352@cau.edu.cn zhiwu.zhang@wsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5784-9684
Shenyang Agricultural University · CNChina Agricultural University · CNJilin University · CNWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Husk has multiple functions such as protecting ears from diseases, infection, and dehydration during development. Additionally, husks comprised of fewer, shorter, thinner, and narrower layers allow faster moisture evaporation of kernels prior to harvest. Intensive studies have been conducted to identify appropriate husk architecture by understanding the genetic basis of related traits, including husk length, husk layer number, husk thickness, and husk width. However, marker-assisted selection is inefficient because the identified quantitative trait loci and associated genetic loci could only explain a small proportion of total phenotypic variation. Genomic selection (GS) has been used successfully on many species including maize on other traits. Thus, the potential of using GS for husk traits to directly identify superior inbred lines, without knowing the specific underlying genetic loci, is well worth exploring. In this study, we compared four GS models on a maize association population with 498 inbred lines belonging to four subpopulations, including 27 lines in stiff stalk, 67 lines in non-stiff stalk, 193 lines in tropical-subtropical, and 211 lines in mixture subpopulations. Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction with principal components as cofactor, performed the best and was selected to examine the impact of interaction between sampling proportions and subpopulations. We found that predictions on inbred lines in a subpopulation were benefited from excluding individuals from other subpopulations for training if the training population within the subpopulation was large enough. Husk thickness exhibited the highest prediction accuracy among all husk traits. These results gave strategic insight to improve husk architecture.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociZea maysGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticbreedingGAPITgBLUPGenomicgenomic selectionGenPredhuskmaizemarker assisted selectionpopulation structurePredictionprediction accuracyrrBLUPShared data resources

Identifiers

PMID32816916
PMCPMC7534435
OpenAlexW3049755005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.