Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816915›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2020

Temporal patterning in neural progenitors: from

Cédric Maurange

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Repair Manual of a Fruit Fly Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epigenetic Regulation in Drosophila Tumor Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Temporal regulation of neural diversity in Drosophila and vertebrates.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Pipsqueak family genesFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Integrated Patterning Programs DuringAnnual review of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cédric MaurangeAix Marseille University, CNRS, IBDM, Equipe Labellisée LIGUE Contre le Cancer, Marseille 13009, France cedric.maurange@univ-amu.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-1419
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The developing central nervous system (CNS) is particularly prone to malignant transformation, but the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. However, periods of tumor susceptibility appear to correlate with windows of increased proliferation, which are often observed during embryonic and fetal stages and reflect stereotypical changes in the proliferative properties of neural progenitors. The temporal mechanisms underlying these proliferation patterns are still unclear in mammals. In

Indexed as

Cell LineageCell ProliferationNeurogenesisAge FactorsAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansNeural Stem CellsTime FactorsDrosophilaMedulloblastomaNeural stem cellPediatric cancerTemporal patterning

Identifiers

PMID32816915
PMCPMC7390627
OpenAlexW3044240472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.