ArticleBMJ case reports2020
Multimodal imaging and adaptive optics in internal limiting membrane dystrophy.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 18-year-old boy presented with a mild blurring of vision in both his eyes for the last 2 years. His best-corrected visual acuity was 20/60 in both the eyes with normal colour vision. Fundus evaluation showed exaggerated shiny reflex from the internal limiting membrane (ILM) with the wrinkled inner retinal surface at posterior pole. No vessel attenuation or retinal pigment epithelium changes were evident. Optical coherence tomography showed thickened ILM, which was appreciated in fundus photo also. The electrodiagnostic tests were normal, and the photoreceptors appeared normal in adaptive optics in the central macula at 2°-4° eccentricity. Among the very few reported cases of Muller cells sheen dystrophy, our patient was the probably the youngest and was picked up by a thoughtful ophthalmologist in detailed clinical examination. Adaptive optics in the case of ILM dystrophy is also not reported earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.