Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816868›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2020

Natural Products: Experimental Approaches to Elucidate Disposition Mechanisms and Predict Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions.

Mary F Paine

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting Natural Product-Drug Interactions with Knowledge Graph Embeddings.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural Products Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 2B6 Activity and Methadone Metabolism.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024
    Article
  7. Translating Kratom-Drug Interactions: From Bedside to Bench and Back.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary F PaineDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington mary.paine@wsu.edu.
Washington State University Spokane · US

Funding

Pharmacology CoreU54AT008909 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAINE, MARY F · 2015 to 2024
$22.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products have been used by humans since antiquity for both egregious and beneficial purposes. Regarding the latter, these products have long been valued as a rich source of phytochemicals and developed into numerous life-saving pharmaceutical agents. Today, the sales and use of natural products with purported medicinal qualities continue to increase worldwide. However, natural products are not subject to the same premarket testing requirements as pharmaceutical agents, creating critical gaps in scientific knowledge about their optimal use. In addition, due to the common misperception that "natural" means "safe," patients may supplement or replace their prescription medications with natural products, placing themselves at undue risk for subefficacious pharmacotherapy or potentially toxic exposure. Collectively, with few exceptions, researchers, health care providers, and educators lack definitive information about how to inform consumers, patients, and students in the health professions on the safe and optimal use of these products. Recognition of this deficiency by key stakeholders, including the three pillars of biomedical research-industry, academia, and government-has facilitated multiple collaborations that are actively addressing this fundamental knowledge gap. This special issue contains a collection of articles highlighting the challenges faced by researchers in the field and the use of various experimental systems and methods to improve the mechanistic understanding of the disposition and drug interaction potential of natural products. Continued refinement of existing, and development of new, approaches will progress toward the common overarching goal of improving public health. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Natural products with purported medicinal value constitute an increasing share of the contemporary health care market. Natural products are not subject to the same premarket testing requirements as drug products, creating fundamental scientific knowledge gaps about the safe and effective use of these products. Collaborations among industrial, academic, and governmental researchers in multiple disciplines are anticipated to provide the definitive information needed to fill these gaps and improve public health.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCells, CulturedClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug InteractionsHepatocytesHumansMicrosomes, LiverPrescription DrugsBiological ProductsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID32816868
PMCPMC7543467
OpenAlexW3049017693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.