ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020
RETRACTED: Prioritising primary care patients with unexpected weight loss for cancer investigation: diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A scoping review of unexpected weight loss and cancer: risk, guidelines, and recommendations for follow-up in primary care.BJGP open · 2024Article
- RETRACTION: Prioritising primary care patients with unexpected weight loss for cancer investigation: diagnostic accuracy study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Reevaluating the fraction of cancer attributable to excess weight: overcoming the hidden impact of prediagnostic weight loss.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Association between Blood Test Trends and Undiagnosed Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.Cancers · 2024Review
- Phenotypes and rates of cancer-relevant symptoms and tests in the year before cancer diagnosis in UK Biobank and CPRD Gold.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- The underestimated impact of excess body weight on colorectal cancer risk: Evidence from the UK Biobank cohort.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Association of Weight Loss in Ambulatory Care Settings With First Diagnosis of Lung Cancer in the US.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Underlying cancer risk among patients with fatigue and other vague symptoms: a population-based cohort study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Serious disease risk among patients with unexpected weight loss: a matched cohort of over 70 000 primary care presentations.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Article
- Measured weight loss as a precursor to cancer diagnosis: retrospective cohort analysis of 43 302 primary care patients.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Article
- Cancer risk in persons with new-onset anaemia: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.BMC cancer · 2022Observational
- Article
- Individual inflammatory marker abnormalities or inflammatory marker scores to identify primary care patients with unexpected weight loss for cancer investigation?British journal of cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern · 2024-03-25Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Error in Methods · Updated to Retraction · · See also: https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj-2024-080199.abstract
- Retraction · 2024-10-16Bias Issues or Lack of Balance · Error in Methods · Retract and Replace · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · see: https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj-2024-080199
- Commented on by
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo quantify the predictive value of unexpected weight loss (WL) for cancer according to patient's age, sex, smoking status, and concurrent clinical features (symptoms, signs, and abnormal blood test results).
designDiagnostic accuracy study.
settingClinical Practice Research Datalink electronic health records data linked to the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in primary care, England.
participants63 973 adults (≥18 years) with a code for unexpected WL from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2012.
main outcome measuresCancer diagnosis in the six months after the earliest weight loss code (index date). Codes for additional clinical features were identified in the three months before to one month after the index date. Diagnostic accuracy measures included positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive predictive values, and diagnostic odds ratios.
resultsOf 63 973 adults with unexpected WL, 37 215 (58.2%) were women, 33 167 (51.8%) were aged 60 years or older, and 16 793 (26.3%) were ever smokers. 908 (1.4%) had a diagnosis of cancer within six months of the index date, of whom 882 (97.1%) were aged 50 years or older. The positive predictive value for cancer was above the 3% threshold recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for urgent investigation in male ever smokers aged 50 years or older, but not in women at any age. 10 additional clinical features were associated with cancer in men with unexpected WL, and 11 in women. Positive likelihood ratios in men ranged from 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.32 to 2.62) for non-cardiac chest pain to 6.10 (3.44 to 10.79) for abdominal mass, and in women from 1.62 (1.15 to 2.29) for back pain to 20.9 (10.7 to 40.9) for jaundice. Abnormal blood test results associated with cancer included low albumin levels (4.67, 4.14 to 5.27) and raised values for platelets (4.57, 3.88 to 5.38), calcium (4.28, 3.05 to 6.02), total white cell count (3.76, 3.30 to 4.28), and C reactive protein (3.59, 3.31 to 3.89). However, no normal blood test result in isolation ruled out cancer. Clinical features co-occurring with unexpected WL were associated with multiple cancer sites.
conclusionThe risk of cancer in adults with unexpected WL presenting to primary care is 2% or less and does not merit investigation under current UK guidelines. However, in male ever smokers aged 50 years or older and in patients with concurrent clinical features, the risk of cancer warrants referral for invasive investigation. Clinical features typically associated with specific cancer sites are markers of several cancer types when they occur with unexpected WL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.