ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2020
Performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in early disease, across sexes and ethnicities.
Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Baricitinib decreases anti-dsDNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Trial
- Sex and gender differences in rheumatology: clinical impact and future directions.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Real-world validation of the SLERPI diagnostic model with concordance and discordance analysis across established SLE classification criteria.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Urinary β2-microglobulin as a Potential Biomarker for Early Treatment Selection: A Patient with Severe IgG4-related Tubulointerstitial Nephritis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Sex- and gender-related differences in systemic lupus erythematosus: a scoping review.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- [Clincial Diagnostic Performance of EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012, and ACR-1997 Classification Criteria for Childhood Systemic Lupus Erythematosus].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Performance of the systemic lupus erythematosus risk probability index (SLERPI) in the Egyptian college of rheumatology (ECR) study cohort.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Persisting mortality gap in systemic lupus erythematosus; a population-based study on juvenile- and adult-onset SLE in Norway 1999-2022.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The Multiple Faces of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pearls and Pitfalls for Diagnosis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024Review
- Incidence and medical costs of lupus in Spanish hospitals: a retrospective database analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Autoimmune findings in patients with silicosis in Spain.Drugs in context · 2024Article
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Probability Index: ready for routine use? Results from a Chinese cohort.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the EULAR/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Population-Based Registry.Arthritis care & research · 2023Article
- Usefulness of the lupus low disease activity state as a treatment target in childhood-onset SLE.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
- Complement as a Biomarker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
64 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria.
methodsTwenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated.
resultsThe cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to <3 years (n=196) and ≥5 years (n=879). Among patients with 1 to <3 years disease duration, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 81%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well in men (sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%) and women (sensitivity 97%, specificity 94%). Among women, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 82%). Among white patients, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (95% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 83%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well among black patients (sensitivity of 98%, specificity 100%), and had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria among Hispanic patients (100% vs 86%) and Asian patients (97% vs 77%).
conclusionsThe EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria perform well among patients with early disease, men, women, white, black, Hispanic and Asian patients. These criteria have superior sensitivity than the ACR criteria and/or superior specificity than the SLICC criteria across many subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32816709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.