Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816221›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2020

Prelimbic Cortical Stimulation Improves Spatial Memory Through Distinct Patterns of Hippocampal Gene Expression in Aged Rats.

Shawn Zheng Kai Tan, Joveen Neoh, Andrew John Lawrence, Ed Xuekui Wu, Lee Wei Lim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shawn Zheng Kai TanNeuromodulation Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Joveen NeohNeuromodulation Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Andrew John LawrenceBehavioural Neuroscience Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Ed Xuekui WuDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Lee Wei LimNeuromodulation Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. drlimleewei@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-6285
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia poses major health challenges worldwide, yet current treatments are faced with issues of efficacy and toxicity. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising non-pharmacological treatment for dementia, but most DBS studies use young healthy animals, which may not be aetiologically relevant. In this study, we used an aged rat model in which cognitive decline occurs through a natural ageing process. We used a Morris water maze (MWM) to determine the effects of prelimbic cortex (PrL) DBS on memory in aged rats. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effects of DBS, we carried out microarray, quantitative PCR analysis, and mass spectrometry to detect gene expression and neurotransmitter changes in the hippocampus. We showed PrL DBS improved the performance in MWM, with related distinct patterns of gene expression involving G protein-coupled receptor pathways. We further found neurotransmitter changes in the dorsal hippocampus, which corroborated and extended the microarray findings. Our results suggest that non-neurogenesis pathways play roles in the effects of DBS. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of DBS on memory beyond neurogenesis and to consider the highlighted pathways suggested by our data.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCerebral CortexDeep Brain StimulationGene ExpressionHippocampusMaleMemory DisordersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpatial MemoryDeep brain stimulationdementiahippocampus.memorymicroarrayprelimbic cortex

Identifiers

PMID32816221
PMCPMC7851284
OpenAlexW3080126018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.