Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816148›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2021

Comparing Migratory and Mechanical Properties of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Colon Cancer Cells In Vitro.

Aditi Bhattacharya, Sumedha Saluja, Vishwanath Managuli, Sandeep Agrawal, Devanjan Dey, Bhavuk Garg, Mohammed Tahir Ansari, Sitikantha Roy, Sudip Sen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aditi Bhattacharya *Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Sumedha Saluja *Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Vishwanath ManaguliDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Sandeep AgrawalDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Devanjan DeyDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Bhavuk GargDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Mohammed Tahir AnsariDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Sitikantha RoyDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Sudip SenDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. sudipsen665@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-2836
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColon cancer cells can migrate and metastasize by undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are non-cancerous, multipotent adult stem cells, which can also migrate. In this study, we wanted to compare the biological, physical, and functional properties of these migratory cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsHT-29 and HCT-116, two human colon carcinoma cell lines, represent less aggressive and more aggressive cancer cells, respectively. MSCs were isolated from human bone marrow. After confirming the identity of all the cell types, they were evaluated for E-cadherin, β1-integrin, Vimentin, ZEB-1, β-catenin, and 18S rRNA using Q-PCR. MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity were evaluated using gelatin zymography. Functional tests like wound healing assay, migration assay, and invasion assay were also done. Biomechanical properties like cell stiffness and non-specific adhesion (between indenter probe and cell membrane) were evaluated through nanoindentation using atomic force microscopy (AFM).

resultsExpression of EMT and stem cell markers showed typical expression patterns for HT-29, HCT-116, and MSCs. Functional tests showed that MSCs migrated faster than malignant cells. MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity reinforced this behavior. Interestingly, the migration/invasion capacity of MSCs was comparable to aggressive HCT-116, and more than HT-29. MSCs also showed the maximum cell stiffness and non-specific cell-probe adhesions, followed by HCT116 and HT29 cells.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the migratory properties of MSCs is comparable or even greater than that of cancer cells and despite their high migration potential, they also have the maximum stiffness.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCadherinsCell Line, TumorCell MovementColonic NeoplasmsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMesenchymal Stem CellsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCadherinsITGB1BP1 protein, humanAtomic force microscopyCell stiffnessColon cancer cellsEMTMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID32816148
OpenAlexW3081433440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.