Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816130›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization.

Vinita M Alexander, Joan K Riley, Emily S Jungheim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinita M AlexanderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA. vinita.alexander@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-5398
Joan K RileyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
Emily S JungheimNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess longitudinal trends in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients' choices for disposing of cryopreserved embryos.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of embryo disposition forms submitted between January 2000 and February 2020 at a university-based fertility clinic. Primary outcome was disposition decision. Binary and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine odds ratios (OR) for decisions according to female age, education, race, religion, state of residence, area deprivation index based on zip code, and IVF pregnancy history. We also assessed disposition year, storage duration, and number of stored embryos.

resultsForms were reviewed from 615 patients; 50.6% chose to discard embryos, 45.4% donated to research, and 4.1% chose reproductive donation. In the regression model, two factors were significantly associated with donation to research: female listing "no preference" or declining to list religious preference (OR 2.56, 95%CI 1.44-4.54) and live birth of multiples after IVF (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.05-2.36). Before 2012, females younger than age 30 at storage were equally likely to choose to donate embryos to research as discard them. However, between 2013 and 2020, females younger than 30 were significantly more likely to discard than donate embryos for research (OR 2.87, 95%CI 1.13-7.28).

conclusionSince 2013, the majority of patients younger than 30 at storage have chosen to discard cryopreserved embryos. Before then, patients were more likely to donate embryos for research. To ensure sufficient embryos are available for research, young patients, who are most likely to have cryopreserved embryos, should be counseled about options for donation.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo DispositionEmbryo TransferFertilization in VitroAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansLive BirthMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesCryopreserved embryosEmbryo disposition

Identifiers

PMID32816130
PMCPMC7642147
OpenAlexW3080396485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.