ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Thoracic imaging in cystic fibrosis : Radiography].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic resonance imaging detects onset and association with lung disease severity of bronchial artery dilatation in cystic fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- [Chest X-rays in children and adolescents : Indications and limitations].Der Radiologe · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issuePatients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require regular follow-up examinations, usually from birth onwards, using imaging techniques.
methodsThe conventional chest x‑ray examination is the only technique recommended by the guidelines at this age. The examination can be performed at every age and is well standardized. The radiation dose to the patient is small and does not require any sedation. RADIOLOGICAL FINDINGS AND CLASSIFICATION: The typical structural changes of the bronchi and the lung parenchyma can be depicted. Typical findings are air-trapping, bronchiectasis, peribronchial cuffing, bronchial wall thickening, mucus plugging, nodular opacities, atelectasis and/or consolidations and hilar lymphadenopathy. Different scoring systems have been developed to allow for a relatively easy but reproducible assessment of the severity of the disease. The most important ones for daily clinical practice are the Chrispin-Norman score, Brasfield score, and the Wisconsin score. All of them show a good correlation with pulmonary function parameters and the clinical picture of the patients. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended to take an annual X‑ray for patients with CF, and in addition in individual cases with clinical deterioration. Computed tomography (CT) can be performed if relevant information for treatment is expected to gained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.