Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32816050›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Thoracic imaging in cystic fibrosis : Radiography].

J Ley-Zaporozhan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Ley-ZaporozhanKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Lindwurmstr. 4, 80337, München, Deutschland. Julia.LeyZaporozhan@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issuePatients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require regular follow-up examinations, usually from birth onwards, using imaging techniques.

methodsThe conventional chest x‑ray examination is the only technique recommended by the guidelines at this age. The examination can be performed at every age and is well standardized. The radiation dose to the patient is small and does not require any sedation. RADIOLOGICAL FINDINGS AND CLASSIFICATION: The typical structural changes of the bronchi and the lung parenchyma can be depicted. Typical findings are air-trapping, bronchiectasis, peribronchial cuffing, bronchial wall thickening, mucus plugging, nodular opacities, atelectasis and/or consolidations and hilar lymphadenopathy. Different scoring systems have been developed to allow for a relatively easy but reproducible assessment of the severity of the disease. The most important ones for daily clinical practice are the Chrispin-Norman score, Brasfield score, and the Wisconsin score. All of them show a good correlation with pulmonary function parameters and the clinical picture of the patients. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended to take an annual X‑ray for patients with CF, and in addition in individual cases with clinical deterioration. Computed tomography (CT) can be performed if relevant information for treatment is expected to gained.

Indexed as

BronchiectasisCystic FibrosisPulmonary AtelectasisRadiography, ThoracicHumansLungBronchiectasisChest x‑rayCystic fibrosisMucus pluggingScoring

Identifiers

PMID32816050
OpenAlexW3080698284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.