Trial reportJAMA oncology2020
Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 160 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Laparoscopic And Open Total Gastrectomy In Patients With Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer
Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Long-term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic And Open Total Gastrectomy In Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
Who cites it
160 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to reduce postoperative mortality in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive review and meta-analysis comparing robot-assisted and 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matching studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis evaluating wound infections and other complications following distal versus complete gastrectomy for gastric cancer.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Prophylactic drainage versus non-drainage following gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and future directions.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023Pooled it
- Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficiency of complete omentectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: a meta‑analysis and systematic review.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning identifies the risk of complications after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Trial
- Effect of Oxycodone-Based Multimodal Analgesia on Visceral Pain After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Feasibility of a tubeless enhanced recovery strategy in non-high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Total and Distal Gastrectomy After Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Observational Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- A novel laparoscopic titanium purse-string forceps: application in animal experiments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- The Association Between Number of Hospital Advanced Practice Providers and Surgical Morbidity.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer remains uncertain given the lack of high-level clinical evidence. Objective: To compare the safety of LTG for clinical stage I gastric cancer with that of conventional open total gastrectomy (OTG). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group CLASS02 study was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial that compared the safety of LTG vs OTG with lymphadenectomy for patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. From January 2017 to September 2018, a total of 227 patients were enrolled. Final follow-up was in October 2018. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized to LTG (n = 113) or OTG (n = 114) by an interactive web response system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the morbidity and mortality within 30 days following surgeries between LTG and OTG with a noninferiority margin of 10%. The secondary outcomes were recovery courses and postoperative hospital stays. Results: A total of 214 patients were analyzed for morbidity and mortality (105 patients in the LTG group and 109 patients in the OTG group). The mean (SD) age was 59.8 (9.4) years in the LTG group and 59.4 (9.2) years in the OTG group, and most were male (LTG group, 75 of 105 [71.4%]; OTG group, 80 of 109 [73.4%]). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups (rate difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -11.8% to 9.6%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (2.9%) in the LTG group and 4 patients (3.7%) in the OTG group (rate difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -6.5% to 4.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference in the overall postoperative complication rate of 18.1% in the LTG group and 17.4% in the OTG group (rate difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, -9.6% to 11.0%). One patient in the LTG group died from intra-abdominal bleeding secondary to splenic artery hemorrhage. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between the LTG group and the OTG group (rate difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 5.2%), and the distribution of complication severity was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of the CLASS02 trial showed that the safety of LTG with lymphadenectomy by experienced surgeons for clinical stage I gastric cancer was comparable to that of OTG. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007550.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.