Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32815991›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fenglin Liu, Changming Huang, Zekuan Xu, Xiangqian Su, Gang Zhao, Jianxin Ye, Xiaohui Du, Hua Huang, Jiankun Hu, Guoxin Li and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 160 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03007550 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Laparoscopic And Open Total Gastrectomy In Patients With Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled227ConditionsGastric CancerArmsLaparoscopic total gastrectomy, Open total gastrectomy
NCT04710758 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Long-term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic And Open Total Gastrectomy In Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2028Enrolled1,018ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsArmsLaparoscopic total gastrectomy, Open total gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and future directions.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Fenglin LiuZhongshan Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changming HuangUnion Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zekuan XuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiangqian SuBeijing Cancer Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Gang ZhaoRenji Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jianxin YeDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaohui DuDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua HuangShanghai Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiankun HuWest China Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guoxin LiNanfang Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peiwu YuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to AMU, Chongqing, China.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Jian SuoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Naiqing ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, China.
Haojie LiZhongshan Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongyong HeZhongshan Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yihong SunZhongshan Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group
Fudan University · CNFujian Medical University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNChongqing Medical University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNJilin University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNRenji Hospital · CNSichuan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer remains uncertain given the lack of high-level clinical evidence. Objective: To compare the safety of LTG for clinical stage I gastric cancer with that of conventional open total gastrectomy (OTG). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group CLASS02 study was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial that compared the safety of LTG vs OTG with lymphadenectomy for patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. From January 2017 to September 2018, a total of 227 patients were enrolled. Final follow-up was in October 2018. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized to LTG (n = 113) or OTG (n = 114) by an interactive web response system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the morbidity and mortality within 30 days following surgeries between LTG and OTG with a noninferiority margin of 10%. The secondary outcomes were recovery courses and postoperative hospital stays. Results: A total of 214 patients were analyzed for morbidity and mortality (105 patients in the LTG group and 109 patients in the OTG group). The mean (SD) age was 59.8 (9.4) years in the LTG group and 59.4 (9.2) years in the OTG group, and most were male (LTG group, 75 of 105 [71.4%]; OTG group, 80 of 109 [73.4%]). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups (rate difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -11.8% to 9.6%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (2.9%) in the LTG group and 4 patients (3.7%) in the OTG group (rate difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -6.5% to 4.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference in the overall postoperative complication rate of 18.1% in the LTG group and 17.4% in the OTG group (rate difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, -9.6% to 11.0%). One patient in the LTG group died from intra-abdominal bleeding secondary to splenic artery hemorrhage. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between the LTG group and the OTG group (rate difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 5.2%), and the distribution of complication severity was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of the CLASS02 trial showed that the safety of LTG with lymphadenectomy by experienced surgeons for clinical stage I gastric cancer was comparable to that of OTG. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007550.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32815991
PMCPMC7441466
OpenAlexW3056694921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.