ArticleJAMA oncology2020
Robotic Surgery and Oncologic Outcomes.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing bleeding and surgical complications in transoral robotic surgery for the oropharynx: results of a global survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Smart technologies and digital innovations for improving perioperative patient safety: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Proctored adoption of robotic hiatus hernia surgery: outcomes and learning curves in a high-volume UK centre.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Global trends and hotspots in research of robotic surgery in oncology: A bibliometric and visual analysis from 2002 to 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Construction of machine learning-based models for cancer outcomes in low and lower-middle income countries: A scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32815980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.