Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32815732›Full record

ArticleChronic respiratory disease

Early home-based pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbation of COPD: A feasibility study using an action research approach.

Bruna Wageck, Narelle S Cox, Janet Bondarenko, Monique Corbett, Amanda Nichols, Rosemary Moore, Anne E Holland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Content, uptake and adherence of exercise interventions after an acute exacerbation of COPD: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bruna WageckDiscipline of Physiotherapy, 2080La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8956-8767
Narelle S CoxDiscipline of Physiotherapy, 2080La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Janet BondarenkoDepartment of Physiotherapy, 5392Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Monique CorbettDepartment of Physiotherapy, 5392Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Amanda NicholsCentral Clinical School, 161666Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rosemary MooreInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia.
Anne E HollandDiscipline of Physiotherapy, 2080La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-845X
La Trobe University · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUInstitute for Breathing and Sleep · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves function, reduces symptoms and decreases healthcare usage in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following an acute exacerbation (AECOPD). However, rehabilitation uptake rates are low. This study aimed to address barriers to uptake and completion of PR following AECOPD.

methodsAn action research approach was used to reflect on study feasibility, and to plan and implement an improved protocol. Phase I tested the feasibility of home-based PR started early after AECOPD. Phase II used qualitative interviews to identified potential barriers to program uptake. Phase III re-tested the program with changes to recruitment and assessment strategies.

resultsPhase I: From 97 screened patients, 26 were eligible and 10 (38%) started home-based PR. Eight participants undertook ≥70% of PR sessions, achieving clinically meaningful improvement in 6-minute walk distance (mean (SD) change 76 (60) m) and chronic respiratory disease questionnaire total score (15 (21) units). Phase II: Potential barriers to uptake of home-based PR included access issues, confidence to exercise, and lack of information about PR benefits. Phase III: From 77 screened patients, 23 were eligible and 5 (22%) started the program. DISCUSSION: Home-based PR improved clinical outcomes, but program eligibility and uptake remain challenging. Efforts should be made to ensure PR program eligibility criteria are broad enough to accommodate patient needs, and new ways of engaging patients are needed to improve PR uptake after AECOPD.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceFeasibility StudiesHealth Services ResearchHumansQuality of LifeCOPDexacerbationfeasibilityHome-based pulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32815732
PMCPMC7444104
OpenAlexW3062856843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.