ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Pharmacological treatment of high-normal blood pressure (prehypertension) in high-risk patients for primary prevention of cardiovascular events.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive blood pressure control to prevent major cardiovascular events in individuals with high-normal blood pressure (prehypertension): PRINT-TAHA9 randomized clinical trial.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- Article
- Should elevated blood pressure be treated with antihypertensive drug therapy?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Pharmacological treatment of high-normal blood pressure (prehypertension) in high-risk patients for primary prevention of cardiovascular events.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the best treatment strategy for patients with a high-normal blood pressure (prehypertension) is not known. The authors aimed to determine whether pharmacological reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a normal level (<120 mm Hg) would prevent cardiac morbidity and mortality in prehypertensive patients. In this secondary analysis, the authors obtained the data from SPRINT from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute data repository center. Among 9361 patients enrolled in SPRINT, 289 high-risk (ASCVD risk = 24.8% ± 13.0 [10-65]) prehypertensive patients without previous cardiovascular disease and not receiving any antihypertensive medications were enrolled. One hundred and forty-eight of them were assigned to standard treatment which consisted of clinical follow-up till SBP goes above 140 mm Hg and then staring medications to keep SBP <140 mm Hg. One hundred and forty-one were assigned to the intensive treatment receiving pharmacological SBP reduction to <120 mm Hg upon enrollment. The primary composite outcome was myocardial infarction, and other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Throughout the 3.06 years of follow-up, a primary outcome event was confirmed in three participants (0.74% per year) in the intensive-treatment group and 8 (1.61% per year) in the standard-treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P = .045). Rates of serious adverse events were not increased by intensive-treatment (HR, 0.83; P = .506). Based on this secondary post hoc analysis, intensive SBP reduction may probably be beneficial for primary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk prehypertensive patients. This finding needs to be evaluated in a larger trial designed specifically to answer this question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.