ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2020
New drugs on the horizon for cerebral edema: what's in the clinical development pipeline?
Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alterations in brain fluid physiology during the early stages of development of ischaemic oedema.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024Review
- Effects of perioperative hydrogen inhalation on brain edema and prognosis in patients with glioma: a single-center, randomized controlled study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Endocannabinoid System of the Blood-Brain Barrier: Current Understandings and Therapeutic Potentials.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022Review
- Emerging therapeutic targets for cerebral edema.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2021Review
- TRPM4 Expression During Postnatal Developmental of Mouse CA1 Pyramidal Neurons.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- Glibenclamide Attenuates Neuroinflammation and Promotes Neurological Recovery After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Aged Rats.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionResearch has advanced our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of cerebral edema and has propelled the development of novel antiedema therapeutics. Current evidence supports aberrant neuro-glial ion transport as a central mechanism that underlies pathological fluid accumulation after central nervous system injury. AREAS COVERED: Novel agents in clinical development show potential in altering the natural history and treatment of cerebral edema. Using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, we review recent advances in our understanding of cerebral edema and describe agents under active investigation, their mechanism, and their application in recent and ongoing clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Pharmacotherapies that target molecular mechanisms underlying the compensatory post-injury response of ion channels and transporters that lead to pathological alteration of osmotic gradients are the most promising therapeutic strategies. Repurposing of drugs such as glyburide that inhibit the aberrant upregulation of ion channels such as SUR1-TRPM4, and novel agents, such as ZT-1a, which reestablish physiological regulation of ion channels such as NKCC1/KCC, could be useful adjuvants to prevent and even reverse fluid accumulation in the brain parenchyma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.