ReviewChemical reviews2020
Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Density, Extrudable Collagen Types I and II Microfiber-Based Inks for Tissue Engineering Applications.Polymers · 2026Article
- MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Printing to Fight Antimicrobial Resistance Through Nano/Microstructured Platforms.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Thiolated Polymers in 3D Bioprinting: Control of Gelation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Balancing Strength and Cell Viability in Gelatin Methacrylate/Gellan Gum Bioink Formulations.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Rheological Behavior, Filament Stability, and Microstructure of an Extrusion-Processable Kefiran-PG Formulation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Approaching Scarless Wound Healing: From Passive Anti-Fibrotic to Proactive and Programmable Pro-Regenerative Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Data-Driven Printability Modeling of Hydrogels for Precise Direct Ink Writing Based on Rheological Properties.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- 3D Printing with Tragacanth-Gum-Based Bioinks: A New Frontier in Bioprinting Materials.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rectal In Situ Thermosensitive Gel Loaded with Agomelatine-Silver Nanoparticles: Formulation and Characterization.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hydrogel-based neural engineering for skin wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bridging biology and technology: the rise of 3D bioprinting advancements in infection research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Injectable Hydrogels for Biomedical and Aesthetic Applications: Focus on Rheological Characteristics.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Multifunctional Double-Network Hydrogel with Porous, Adhesive, and Immunomodulatory Properties for Minimally Invasive Soft Tissue Repair.Small science · 2025Article
- Recent progress of 3D printed responsive scaffolds for bone repair: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Toward a harmonized regulatory framework for 3D-printed pharmaceutical products: the role of critical feedstock materials and process parameters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioprinting researchers agree that "printability" is a key characteristic for bioink development, but neither the meaning of the term nor the best way to experimentally measure it has been established. Furthermore, little is known with respect to the underlying mechanisms which determine a bioink's printability. A thorough understanding of these mechanisms is key to the intentional design of new bioinks. For the purposes of this review, the domain of printability is defined as the bioink requirements which are unique to bioprinting and occur during the printing process. Within this domain, the different aspects of printability and the factors which influence them are reviewed. The extrudability, filament classification, shape fidelity, and printing accuracy of bioinks are examined in detail with respect to their rheological properties, chemical structure, and printing parameters. These relationships are discussed and areas where further research is needed, are identified. This review serves to aid the bioink development process, which will continue to play a major role in the successes and failures of bioprinting, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.