ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021
Patient expectations and awareness of information regarding adverse reactions in drug labelling in China.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Mobile Technologies to Streamline Pretriage Patient Flow in the Emergency Department: Observational Usability Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Observational
- The severity of adverse drug reactions and their influencing factors based on the ADR monitoring center of Henan Province.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background The misunderstanding of adverse drug reaction labelling information is not conducive to the rational use of drugs. There has been no research on how doctors can effectively transmit information on adverse drug reactions to patients in China. Objective To assess how well patients understand the adverse reactions presented in the labelling of drugs and how much information they want from their doctor regarding the adverse reactions. Setting The study was conducted in secondary medical institutions, tertiary medical institutions and community healthcare centres in Shanghai. Method A cross-sectional self-administered survey was conducted from November 2018 to March 2019. Mixed methods involving paper questionnaires and online surveys (scan a QR code by the WeChat app) were used. Main outcome measure Participants' demand for adverse reaction information. Results A total of 295 people completed the questionnaires, of which 31.8% of people thought that the greater the number of adverse reactions listed on the label of a drug, the more insecure they felt about that drug. At the same time, 30.13% of people thought that if the adverse reactions listed on a label were undefined, then the drug was safe for use (for example, some Chinese patent medicines). Most of the respondents (45.4%) thought that it was better to give a brief description of possible adverse reactions and to answer patients' questions in detail only if necessary. Conclusions Most patients wanted doctors to give them a brief introduction to serious and common adverse reactions when they prescribed drugs, and only a small percentage of people wanted to obtain all the information about adverse reactions. It was found that many people misunderstood the contents of the adverse reactions provided on the labels and equated the number of adverse reactions with drug safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32815111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.