Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32815020›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

BODY-Q patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) to assess sleeve gastrectomy vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: eating behavior, eating-related distress, and eating-related symptoms.

Danny Mou, Claire E E de Vries, Nena Pater, Lotte Poulsen, Dennis J S Makarawung, Marinus J Wiezer, Ruben N van Veen, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Jens A Sorensen, Anne F Klassen and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Danny MouDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Dmou2@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3563
Claire E E de VriesDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Nena PaterMaastricht University Medical School, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lotte PoulsenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Dennis J S MakarawungDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Marinus J WiezerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Ruben N van VeenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten M HoogbergenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jens A SorensenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anne F KlassenDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andrea L PusicDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Ali TavakkoliDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLMcMaster University · CAOdense University Hospital · DKRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative changes in eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms play an important role in the lives of bariatric surgery patients. However, there are no studies that assess these outcomes using a specifically designed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We use our newly developed and validated scales as part of the well-established BODY-Q PROMs to compare laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (LRYGB).

methodsWe analyzed data from an international multi-center prospective cohort study of patients over 18 who underwent bariatric surgery. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the difference between LRYGB and LSG for the new BODY-Q scales, which include eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms. All analyses were corrected for significant confounding variables.

resultsOut of 1420 patients, 920 underwent LRYGB and 500 underwent LSG. The LRYGB group had a higher percentage total weight loss (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in eating behavior (e.g., stop eating before feeling full, avoiding unhealthy snacks, etc.) or eating-related distress (e.g., feeling ashamed or out of control after eating). Patients who underwent LSG scored significantly better on the post-prandial eating-related symptoms scale (e.g., vomiting, reflux; p < 0.001). Symptoms more prevalent in the LRYGB patients were related to dumping syndrome whereas symptoms more prevalent in LSG patients were related to reflux.

conclusionPatients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss after surgery, but they scored worse on post-prandial symptoms in comparison to LSG patients. This information may be relevant for patients in the pre-operative counseling setting, as it may influence their decision for surgical procedure selection.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidFeeding BehaviorGastrectomyHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryEating behaviorEating symptomsPatient-reported outcome measuresQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32815020
OpenAlexW3065913624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.