ArticleCalcified tissue international2020
Reference Intervals for Bone Histomorphometric Measurements Based on Data from Healthy Premenopausal Women.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Blocking interaction of sclerostin loop3 with osteoblastic LRP4 counteracts bone loss without increasing arterial stiffness during mechanical unloading.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Osteoblastic sclerostin loop3-LRP4 interaction required by sclerostin to inhibit bone formation.Bone research · 2026Article
- Differences in bone histomorphometry between White postmenopausal women with and without atypical femoral fracture after long-term bisphosphonate therapy.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Article
- Bone Material Properties in Bone Diseases Affecting Children.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- Effect of vitamin D metabolites on bone histomorphometry in healthy black and white women: An attempt to unravel the so-called vitamin D paradox in blacks.Bone reports · 2023Article
- No evidence of mineralization abnormalities in iliac bone of premenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study has established the normal reference intervals for bone histomorphometric measurements derived from healthy premenopausal women, which is rarely available. We presented the static and dynamic bone histomorphometric data from trans-iliac bone biopsies in 62 healthy premenopausal women (19 blacks and 43 whites, ages 20-53 years). There were no significant differences in age and BMI between black and white women. Since there was no significant difference in bone remodeling between the two ethnic groups, we pooled data of all 62 premenopausal women to establish normal reference intervals for bone histomorphometry. The results provide normal reference intervals for both static and dynamic histomorphometric variables in cancellous and cortical bone of the ilium. None of the bone remodeling-related variables correlated with age or BMI. This study provides reference intervals for bone histomorphometric measurements in both cancellous and cortical bone of the ilium, which would be helpful in the evaluation of bone health in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.