Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32814839›Full record

Observational studyLeukemia2021

Compassionate use of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib for severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study.

Alessandro M Vannucchi, Benedetta Sordi, Alessandro Morettini, Carlo Nozzoli, Loredana Poggesi, Filippo Pieralli, Alessandro Bartoloni, Alessandro Atanasio, Filippo Miselli, Chiara Paoli and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. JAK inhibitors and COVID-19.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro M Vannucchi *Center Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy. amvannucchi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-0730
Benedetta Sordi *Center Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro MorettiniInternal Medicine Unit 2, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-9599
Carlo NozzoliInternal Medicine Unit 1, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Loredana PoggesiInternal Medicine Unit 3, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Filippo PieralliIntermediate Care Unit COVID-19, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro BartoloniInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro AtanasioCenter Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Filippo MiselliCenter Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-9382
Chiara PaoliCenter Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe G LoscoccoCenter Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-1206
Andrea FanelliInternal Medicine Unit 2, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Ombretta ParaInternal Medicine Unit 1, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Andrea BerniInternal Medicine Unit 3, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Irene TassinariIntermediate Care Unit COVID-19, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo ZammarchiInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Laura MaggiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alessio MazzoniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Valentina ScottiInternal Medicine Unit 2, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Giorgia FalchettiInternal Medicine Unit 2, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Danilo MalandrinoInternal Medicine Unit 3, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1053-5178
Fabio LuiseIntermediate Care Unit COVID-19, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni MillottiInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Sara BenciniCytometry and Immunotherapy Diagnostic Center (CDCI), AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Manuela CaponeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marie Pierre PiccinniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco Annunziato *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Paola Guglielmelli *Center Research Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM), SOD Hematology, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-284X
RUXO-COVID Study Group
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overwhelming inflammatory reactions contribute to respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19. Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor with potent anti-inflammatory properties. We report on a prospective, observational study in 34 patients with COVID-19 who received ruxolitinib on a compassionate-use protocol. Patients had severe pulmonary disease defined by pulmonary infiltrates on imaging and an oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in air and/or PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mmHg. Median age was 80.5 years, and 85.3% had ≥ 2 comorbidities. Median exposure time to ruxolitinib was 13 days, median dose intensity was 20 mg/day. Overall survival by day 28 was 94.1%. Cumulative incidence of clinical improvement of ≥2 points in the ordinal scale was 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 71-93). Clinical improvement was not affected by low-flow versus high-flow oxygen support but was less frequent in patients with PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg. The most frequent adverse events were anemia, urinary tract infections, and thrombocytopenia. Improvement of inflammatory cytokine profile and activated lymphocyte subsets was observed at day 14. In this prospective cohort of aged and high-risk comorbidity patients with severe COVID-19, compassionate-use ruxolitinib was safe and was associated with improvement of pulmonary function and discharge home in 85.3%. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to establish efficacy of ruxolitinib in COVID-19.

Indexed as

Compassionate Use TrialsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyComorbidityCOVID-19FemaleHumansJanus Kinase 1Janus Kinase 2Janus Kinase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesBiomarkersJAK1 protein, humanJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 1Janus Kinase 2Janus Kinase InhibitorsNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID32814839
PMCPMC7437386
OpenAlexW3049911747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.