Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32814811›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Vladimir Sadkin, Viktor Sкuridin, Evgeny Nesterov, Elena Stasyuk, Alexander Rogov, Natalya Varlamova, Roman Zelchan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ExploringACS omega · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. An investigation of aspects of radiochemical purity ofEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vladimir SadkinTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia. sadkin@tpu.ru.
Viktor SкuridinTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
Evgeny NesterovTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
Elena StasyukTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
Alexander RogovTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
Natalya VarlamovaTomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina Avenue, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
Roman ZelchanTomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny street, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The work considers the problem of obtaining nanocolloid radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) and studying their functional suitability for diagnosing sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in cancer patients. Two principal approaches to the formation of technetium-99m-labeled particles based on inorganic and organic matrices were considered when carrying out research to develop methods for the production of nanocolloid RPs. The composition of the reagents and the conditions for obtaining nanocolloid radiopharmaceuticals were determined. The functional suitability of new RPs for scintigraphic diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes has been studied.

Indexed as

AnimalsLymphoscintigraphyMaleRadiopharmaceuticalsRatsRats, WistarSentinel Lymph NodeTechnetium Tc 99m Aggregated AlbuminTissue DistributionRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin

Identifiers

PMID32814811
PMCPMC7438322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.