Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32814573›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2020

Safety and bactericidal efficacy of cold atmospheric plasma generated by a flexible surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge device against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo.

Gabrielle S Dijksteel, Magda M W Ulrich, Marcel Vlig, Ana Sobota, Esther Middelkoop, Bouke K H L Boekema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Solutions for Sustainable Food Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Biofilm · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle S DijksteelAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands. gdijksteel@burns.nl.
Magda M W UlrichAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Marcel VligAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Ana SobotaDept. of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Esther MiddelkoopAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Bouke K H L BoekemaAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Association of Dutch Burn Centres · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCold atmospheric plasma (CAP), which is ionized gas produced at atmospheric pressure, could be a novel and potent antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infected wounds. Previously we have shown that CAP generated with a flexible surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (sDBD) is highly effective against bacteria in vitro and in ex vivo burn wound models. In the current paper, we determined the in vitro and in vivo safety and efficacy of CAP generated by this sDBD device.

methodsThe effect of CAP on DNA mutations of V79 fibroblasts was measured using a hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) assay. Furthermore, effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis and DNA damage in ex vivo burn wound models (BWMs) were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Next, 10

resultsExposure of V79 fibroblasts to CAP did not increase the numbers of mutated colonies. Additionally, the number of proliferative, apoptotic and DNA damaged cells in the BWMs was comparable to that of the unexposed control. Exposure of PAO1 to CAP for 2 min resulted in the complete elimination of bacteria in vitro. Contrarily, CAP treatment for 6 min of rat wounds colonized with PAO1 did not effectively reduce the in vivo bacterial count.

conclusionsCAP treatment was safe but showed limited efficacy against PAO1 in our rat wound infection model.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBurnsCell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCricetulusDisease Models, AnimalDNA DamageFemaleFibroblastsHumansMaleMutationPlasma GasesPseudomonas aeruginosaPlasma GasesCold atmospheric plasmaDielectric barrier dischargeEfficacyPseudomonas aeruginosaSafetyWound and soft tissue infections

Identifiers

PMID32814573
PMCPMC7439657
OpenAlexW3074630778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.