Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32814568›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020

Differentiating novel coronavirus pneumonia from general pneumonia based on machine learning.

Chenglong Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Chenbin Liu, Qingfeng Sun, Wenxian Peng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chenglong LiuSchool of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Xiaoyang WangDepartment of Radiology, Ruian People's Hospital, Zhejiang, 325200, China.
Chenbin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (CAMS) Shenzhen Cancer Hospital, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Qingfeng SunInfectious Disease Department, Ruian People's Hospital, Zhejiang, 325200, China.
Wenxian PengCollege of Medical Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China. pengwx@sumhs.edu.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNRuian People's Hospital · CNShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Ruian Science and Technology Bureau MS2020023Ruian Science and Technology Bureau MS2020025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest CT screening as supplementary means is crucial in diagnosing novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) with high sensitivity and popularity. Machine learning was adept in discovering intricate structures from CT images and achieved expert-level performance in medical image analysis.

methodsAn integrated machine learning framework on chest CT images for differentiating COVID-19 from general pneumonia (GP) was developed and validated. Seventy-three confirmed COVID-19 cases were consecutively enrolled together with 27 confirmed general pneumonia patients from Ruian People's Hospital, from January 2020 to March 2020. To accurately classify COVID-19, region of interest (ROI) delineation was implemented based on ground-glass opacities (GGOs) before feature extraction. Then, 34 statistical texture features of COVID-19 and GP ROI images were extracted, including 13 gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, 15 gray-level-gradient co-occurrence matrix (GLGCM) features and 6 histogram features. High-dimensional features impact the classification performance. Thus, ReliefF algorithm was leveraged to select features. The relevance of each feature was the average weights calculated by ReliefF in n times. Features with relevance larger than the empirically set threshold T were selected. After feature selection, the optimal feature set along with 4 other selected feature combinations for comparison were applied to the ensemble of bagged tree (EBT) and four other machine learning classifiers including support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and K-nearest neighbor with Minkowski distance equal weight (KNN) using tenfold cross-validation. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe classification accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE) of our proposed method yield 94.16%, 88.62% and 100.00%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.99. The experimental results indicate that the EBT algorithm with statistical textural features based on GGOs for differentiating COVID-19 from general pneumonia achieved high transferability, efficiency, specificity, sensitivity, and impressive accuracy, which is beneficial for inexperienced doctors to more accurately diagnose COVID-19 and essential for controlling the spread of the disease.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMalePandemicsPneumoniaPneumonia, ViralTomography, X-Ray ComputedChest CTGeneral pneumoniaMachine learningNovel coronavirus pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID32814568
PMCPMC7436068
OpenAlexW3049516045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.