ArticleCell reports2020
Affinity for the Interface Underpins Potency of Antibodies Operating In Membrane Environments.
Article in Cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinctive Membrane Accommodation Traits Underpinning the Neutralization Activity of HIV-1 Antibody against MPER.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Generation of a Nonbilayer Lipid Nanoenvironment after Epitope Binding Potentiates Neutralizing HIV-1 MPER Antibody.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- On the antimicrobial properties and endurance of eugenol and 2-phenylphenol functionalized sol-gel coatings.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Matrixed CDR grafting: A neoclassical framework for antibody humanization and developability.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024Article
- Molecular recognition of a membrane-anchored HIV-1 pan-neutralizing epitope.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Functional Delineation of a Protein-Membrane Interaction Hotspot Site on the HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibody 10E8.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Engineering pan-HIV-1 neutralization potency through multispecific antibody avidity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Focal accumulation of aromaticity at the CDRH3 loop mitigates 4E10 polyreactivity without altering its HIV neutralization profile.iScience · 2021Article
- Conformational plasticity underlies membrane fusion induced by an HIV sequence juxtaposed to the lipid envelope.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting HIV-1 gp41.Viruses · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The contribution of membrane interfacial interactions to recognition of membrane-embedded antigens by antibodies is currently unclear. This report demonstrates the optimization of this type of antibodies via chemical modification of regions near the membrane but not directly involved in the recognition of the epitope. Using the HIV-1 antibody 10E8 as a model, linear and polycyclic synthetic aromatic compounds are introduced at selected sites. Molecular dynamics simulations predict the favorable interactions of these synthetic compounds with the viral lipid membrane, where the epitope of the HIV-1 glycoprotein Env is located. Chemical modification of 10E8 with aromatic acetamides facilitates the productive and specific recognition of the native antigen, partially buried in the crowded environment of the viral membrane, resulting in a dramatic increase of its capacity to block viral infection. These observations support the harnessing of interfacial affinity through site-selective chemical modification to optimize the function of antibodies that target membrane-proximal epitopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.