ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed on electrocardiogram vs echocardiography.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning-enabled ECG system for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy and predicting cardiovascular prognoses.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Understanding the hidden burden: prevalence and factors linked to left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients receiving care in Harari region, Ethiopia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of volume indices in bioelectrical impedance measurement on the assessment of cardiac function indices by echocardiography in hemodialysis patients.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Relationship between cumulative exposure to occupational lifting throughout working life and risk of ischemic heart disease in men and women. The Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank.Annals of work exposures and health · 2024Article
- Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: Is the electrocardiogram enough for risk stratification?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Article
- Performance of the Newly Proposed Peguero-Lo Presti Criterion in Adults with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Association between exposure to heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional analysis from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed on electrocardiogram vs echocardiography.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
It is unclear whether 12-lead ECG employing standard criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) provides similar information with respect to long-term cardiovascular risk as echocardiography. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 1376 individuals without cardiovascular disease, who underwent ECG (LVH defined using the Sokolow-Lyon voltage combination (>35 mm) or the Cornell voltage-duration product (>2440 mm × ms)) and echocardiography (LVH defined as LV mass index (LVMI) >95 g/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.