Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813784›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020

Contraceptive use and the intention to become pregnant among women attending the Brazilian Unified Health System.

Celia Regina Maganha E Melo, Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Luciane Simões Duarte, Natália de Castro Nascimento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celia Regina Maganha E MeloEscola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Vilela BorgesEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Luciane Simões DuarteEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Natália de Castro NascimentoEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto analyze the use of contraceptive methods and the intention to become pregnant among women attending the Brazilian Unified Health System.

methoda cross-sectional study conducted with 688 women aged 18-49 years old, attending the Family Health Strategy Facilities in the eastern part of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, who were awaiting medical or nursing consultation. Data were obtained through interviews with a structured instrument, allocated in tablets. The analysis was conducted with "strong desire to avoid pregnancy" as the dependent variable. Chi-square and multiple logistic regression were used, calculated in Stata 14.2.

results56.5% used some contraceptive method, covariates of the strong desire to avoid pregnancy were marital status (OR=0.49; CI95%=0.33-0.74), parity - two and more children (OR=15.9; IC95%=4.29-59.1); and pregnancy planning - planned (OR=0.69; IC95%=0.73-0.94) and ambivalent (OR=2.94; IC95%=1.30-3.83). There was no statistical difference between the strong desire to avoid pregnancy and the type of contraceptive used.

conclusionwomen with a strong desire to avoid pregnancy used basically the same types of contraceptive methods as women in general, which shows that they have not been supported to achieve their reproductive preferences.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorIntentionAdolescentAdultBrazilChildContraceptionContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID32813784
PMCPMC7426141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.