ArticlePloS one2020
Active semi-supervised learning for biological data classification.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Language model-based self-training reduces labeled data requirements by 99% for biological sequence classification.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Article
- Policy Learning for Actively Labeled Sample Selection on Lumbar Semi-supervised Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence: the human response to approach the complexity of big data in biology.GigaScience · 2025Review
- Boundary sample-based class-weighted semi-supervised learning for malignant tumor classification of medical imaging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Recent advances in the development of tumor microenvironment-activatable nanomotors for deep tumor penetration.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Foundations for improved vaccine correlate of risk analysis using positive-unlabeled learning.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- A3SOM, abstained explainable semi-supervised neural network based on self-organizing map.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of Semi-Supervised Active Learning in Automated Wound Image Segmentation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- In silico identification of multiple conserved motifs within the control region of Culicidae mitogenomes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comprehensive study of semi-supervised learning for DNA methylation-based supervised classification of central nervous system tumors.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Semi-supervised learning in cancer diagnostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Active Semisupervised Model for Improving the Identification of Anticancer Peptides.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Semisupervised Deep Learning Techniques for Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome From Time-Series Clinical Data: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to datasets have continuously grown, efforts have been performed in the attempt to solve the problem related to the large amount of unlabeled data in disproportion to the scarcity of labeled data. Another important issue is related to the trade-off between the difficulty in obtaining annotations provided by a specialist and the need for a significant amount of annotated data to obtain a robust classifier. In this context, active learning techniques jointly with semi-supervised learning are interesting. A smaller number of more informative samples previously selected (by the active learning strategy) and labeled by a specialist can propagate the labels to a set of unlabeled data (through the semi-supervised one). However, most of the literature works neglect the need for interactive response times that can be required by certain real applications. We propose a more effective and efficient active semi-supervised learning framework, including a new active learning method. An extensive experimental evaluation was performed in the biological context (using the ALL-AML, Escherichia coli and PlantLeaves II datasets), comparing our proposals with state-of-the-art literature works and different supervised (SVM, RF, OPF) and semi-supervised (YATSI-SVM, YATSI-RF and YATSI-OPF) classifiers. From the obtained results, we can observe the benefits of our framework, which allows the classifier to achieve higher accuracies more quickly with a reduced number of annotated samples. Moreover, the selection criterion adopted by our active learning method, based on diversity and uncertainty, enables the prioritization of the most informative boundary samples for the learning process. We obtained a gain of up to 20% against other learning techniques. The active semi-supervised learning approaches presented a better trade-off (accuracies and competitive and viable computational times) when compared with the active supervised learning ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.