Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813684›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Characterization of patients with advanced chronic pancreatitis using natural language processing of radiology reports.

Fagen Xie, Qiaoling Chen, Yichen Zhou, Wansu Chen, Jemianne Bautista, Emilie T Nguyen, Rex A Parker, Bechien U Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fagen XieResearch & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Qiaoling ChenResearch & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Yichen ZhouResearch & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Wansu ChenResearch & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Jemianne BautistaDepartment of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Emilie T NguyenDepartment of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rex A ParkerDepartment of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Bechien U WuCenter for Pancreatic Care, Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-2704
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Prevention of Pancreatogenic Diabetes - Administrative SupplementU01DK108314 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mark Goodarzi, Stephen J. Pandol · 2015 to 2026
$6.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

aimTo develop and apply a natural language processing algorithm for characterization of patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis in a diverse integrated U.S. healthcare system.

methodsRetrospective cohort study including patients initially diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (CP) within a regional integrated healthcare system between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. Imaging reports from these patients were extracted from the electronic medical record system and split into training, validation and implementation datasets. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was first developed through the training dataset to identify specific features (atrophy, calcification, pseudocyst, cyst and main duct dilatation) from free-text radiology reports. The validation dataset was applied to validate the performance by comparing against the manual chart review. The developed algorithm was then applied to the implementation dataset. We classified patients with calcification(s) or ≥2 radiographic features as advanced CP. We compared etiology, comorbid conditions, treatment parameters as well as survival between advanced CP and others diagnosed during the study period.

results6,346 patients were diagnosed with CP during the study period with 58,085 radiology studies performed. For individual features, NLP yielded sensitivity from 88.7% to 95.3%, specificity from 98.2% to 100.0%. A total of 3,672 patients met cohort inclusion criteria: 1,330 (36.2%) had evidence of advanced CP. Patients with advanced CP had increased frequency of smoking (57.8% vs. 43.0%), diabetes (47.6% vs. 35.9%) and underweight body mass index (6.6% vs. 3.6%), all p<0.001. Mortality from pancreatic cancer was higher in advanced CP (15.3/1,000 person-year vs. 2.8/1,000, p<0.001). Underweight BMI (HR 1.6, 95% CL 1.2, 2.1), smoking (HR 1.4, 95% CL 1.1, 1.7) and diabetes (HR 1.4, 95% CL 1.2, 1.6) were independent risk factors for mortality.

conclusionPatients with advanced CP experienced increased disease-related complications and pancreatic cancer-related mortality. Excess all-cause mortality was driven primarily by potentially modifiable risk factors including malnutrition, smoking and diabetes.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAdultAgedBody Mass IndexDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, ChronicProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32813684
PMCPMC7437899
OpenAlexW3072100321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.