Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813503›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2020

Measuring Environmental Exposure to Enteric Pathogens in Low-Income Settings: Review and Recommendations of an Interdisciplinary Working Group.

Frederick G B Goddard, Radu Ban, Dana Boyd Barr, Joe Brown, Jennifer Cannon, John M Colford, Joseph N S Eisenberg, Ayse Ercumen, Helen Petach, Matthew C Freeman and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Frederick G B GoddardGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7585-0120
Radu BanBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Dana Boyd BarrGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Joe BrownSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-4148
Jennifer CannonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States.
John M ColfordDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Joseph N S EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Ayse ErcumenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-1514
Helen PetachU.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20004, United States.
Matthew C FreemanGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-2572
Karen LevyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, United States.
Stephen P LubyDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, California 94305, United States.
Christine MoeCenter for Global Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Amy J PickeringDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6193-2221
Jeremy A SarnatGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Jill StewartDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3474-5233
Evan ThomasMortenson Center in Global Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-8407
Mami TaniuchiDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States.
Thomas ClasenGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI William Michael Caudle · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections with enteric pathogens impose a heavy disease burden, especially among young children in low-income countries. Recent findings from randomized controlled trials of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have raised questions about current methods for assessing environmental exposure to enteric pathogens. Approaches for estimating sources and doses of exposure suffer from a number of shortcomings, including reliance on imperfect indicators of fecal contamination instead of actual pathogens and estimating exposure indirectly from imprecise measurements of pathogens in the environment and human interaction therewith. These shortcomings limit the potential for effective surveillance of exposures, identification of important sources and modes of transmission, and evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions. In this review, we summarize current and emerging approaches used to characterize enteric pathogen hazards in different environmental media as well as human interaction with those media (external measures of exposure), and review methods that measure human infection with enteric pathogens as a proxy for past exposure (internal measures of exposure). We draw from lessons learned in other areas of environmental health to highlight how external and internal measures of exposure can be used to more comprehensively assess exposure. We conclude by recommending strategies for advancing enteric pathogen exposure assessments.

Indexed as

HygieneSanitationChildChild, PreschoolEnvironmental ExposureFecesHumansPoverty

Identifiers

PMID32813503
PMCPMC7547864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.