Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813178›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021

Rescue catheter-based therapies for the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism after unsuccessful systemic thrombolysis.

Maofeng Gong, Guoping Chen, Boxiang Zhao, Jie Kong, Jianping Gu, Xu He

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maofeng GongDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China.
Guoping ChenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China.
Boxiang ZhaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China.
Jie KongDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China.
Jianping GuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China.
Xu HeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, People's Republic of China. Hexunj@163.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who did not respond to systemic thrombolysis (ST) has not been well established. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based therapies (CDT) in this condition. We conducted a retrospective study of PE patients after unsuccessful ST (UST) between January 2012 and January 2018. Massive PE was identified in 408 patients and treated with full-dose ST therapy. Thrombolysis at 36 h was judged to be unsuccessful in 52 patients. Four ineligible patients were excluded, and the remaining 48 patients underwent rescue CDT: 30 patients underwent thrombus fragmentation with a rotating pigtail catheter; 8 patients underwent Straub rotational thrombectomy; and 10 patients underwent AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy. In total, 42 patients subsequently underwent CDT relative to reduced-dose thrombolysis. Pooled clinical success was achieved in 45 patients, and the time-to-clinical instability relief for CDT was short (i.e., 48 h). Clinical findings significantly improved with oxygen saturation and the shock index (p < 0.01). CDT resulted in a significant decrease in the right ventricular (RV)/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ratio and the average number of patients with pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.01). None of the patients suffered major complications or procedure-related adverse events, and two patients experienced minor complications. During follow-up, RV function symptoms were uneventful. The present study found that CDT is a safe and effective modality for rescue management of massive PE in patients with clinical instability and RV dysfunction after UST, leading to improved clinical outcomes and RV function with a low complication rate.

Indexed as

Mechanical ThrombolysisPulmonary EmbolismThrombectomyFemaleHeart Function TestsHemodynamic MonitoringHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSalvage TherapySeverity of Illness IndexThrombolytic TherapyVentricular Function, RightEmergency careHigh-risk or massive pulmonary embolismPercutaneous mechanical thrombectomyRadiology interventionThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID32813178
OpenAlexW3065896804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.