ArticleVirus genes2020
Isolation and phylogenomic analysis of two Senecavirus A isolates in Sichuan Province, 2018.
Article in Virus genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenicity of the First Buffalo-origin Senecavirus A in Conventional Piglets and Buffaloes.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Development and characterization of a recombinant Senecavirus A expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Transcriptome Analyses of Senecavirus A-Infected PK-15 Cells: RIG-I and IRF7 Are the Important Factors in Inducing Type III Interferons.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Pathogenicity of Seneca Valley virus in pigs and detection in Culicoides from an infected pig farm.Virology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In our study, we isolated and characterised two new Senecavirus A (SVA) isolates in Sichuan Province, China. Phylogenetic analysis of both the SVA full-length genomes and the VP1 genes revealed that the two new SVA isolates are more closely related to previous Chinese strains and US strains. The most variable isolate, SVV-SC-01, showed a significant difference from previous SVA strains, and it was identified as a recombinant using several algorithms. Study findings indicate that the SVA virus in China is constantly evolving and new SVA variants may have emerged. Hence, we must take effective measures to prevent further spread of SVA. This report provides evidence that SVA infection of pigs has occurred in Sichuan Province, and the results will contribute to our understanding of the genetic characteristics and recombinant events of SVA in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32813144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.