ReviewDer Pathologe2020
[Drug-induced liver injury-significance of pathology].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding liver injury in cystic fibrosis: How to tell drug-induced liver injury from cystic fibrosis liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Hepatic expression of IL-8, IL-10, and CXCL-14 in drug-induced liver injury: correlation with histopathology and prognostic value.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- [Hepatitis diagnostics : Differential diagnosis of viral hepatitis from other causes of elevated transaminases].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many different medical agents, herbal products, and dietary supplements can induce drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as a clinically relevant complication. DILI, which is direct toxic or idiosyncratic, can have a broad spectrum of clinical appearances from elevation of liver enzymes to acute liver failure. DILI is categorized clinically according to the pattern of serum parameters or pathologically according to the pattern of histomorphology. Histopathological patterns can be described as hepatitic, granulomatous, cholestatic, ductopenic, fibrotic, steatotic, steatohepatitic, and vascular. Correlation to the corresponding drug can be carried out with the corresponding databases (US National Library of Medicine, Liver Tox; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547852/ ). Liver biopsy, in contrast to a clinical/serological diagnostic, has the advantage of an exact resolution with evidence of pathophysiology, activity, regeneration, chronification, and prognosis. Co-occurrence of underlying liver disease can be excluded or confirmed. Histological patterns of DILI are described and illustrated. A diagnostic algorithm for the interpretation of liver biopsies is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.