Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813119›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Porcine dermal collagen mesh (Permacol™) as a bioprosthesis in the ligation of intersphincteric tract (BioLIFT) procedure.

J S Tsang, T Y Chan, H H Cheung, R Wei, C C Foo, O S H Lo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

J S TsangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR. julianst@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-413X
T Y ChanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR.
H H CheungDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR.
R WeiDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR.
C C FooDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR.
O S H LoDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, SAR.
Queen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLigation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-saving technique used to treat anal fistulas. Incorporation of a bioprosthesis in LIFT (BioLIFT) aims to improve healing. The use of cross-linked porcine dermal collagen mesh Permacol™ in BioLIFT has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the healing rates and outcome of LIFT and BioLIFT for complex anal fistulas using the Permacol™ biological mesh.

methodsA retrospective analysis of all patients having LIFT or BioLIFT for complex fistulas from January 2010 to November 2019 was performed in a tertiary referral centre. Patient data from a prospectively collected database of all patients having LIFT or BioLIFT were analyzed.

resultsLIFT and BioLIFT were performed in 48 (82.8%) and 10 (17.2%) patients, respectively. All BioLIFT patients had previous interventions for their fistulas compared to 30 (62.5%) of patients who had LIFT, p = 0.023. The primary healing rate for LIFT was 87.5% (42/48) compared to 80% (8/10) in BioLIFT, (p = 0.42). Eight (13.8%) patients developed complications, 6 (12.5%) in the LIFT group vs 2 (20%) in the BioLIFT group (p = 0.62). On univariate analysis, the number of previous operations was predictive of complications (p = 0.03). BioLIFT was not associated with complication (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 0.30-10.3, p = 0.54) or primary healing (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.97-3.36, p = 0.54). There was no significant difference in recurrence (LIFT 12.5% vs BioLIFT 0%, p = 0.58). Kaplan-Meier analysis found no difference in time to recurrence between the two groups (p = 0.65).

conclusionPermacol™ mesh in BioLIFT is feasible and achieves a high primary healing rate of 80%. Prospective evidence is needed to establish the benefits of BioLIFT and determine whether Permacol™ is superior to the non-cross-linked porcine submucosal mesh.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisRectal FistulaAnal CanalAnimalsCollagenHumansLigationProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshSwineTreatment OutcomeCollagenAnal fistulaBioLIFTLigation of intersphincteric tract

Identifiers

PMID32813119
OpenAlexW3078934302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.