Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813075›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020

[Health reporting as part of public health surveillance: the example of diabetes].

Lukas Reitzle, Rebecca Paprott, Francesca Färber, Christin Heidemann, Christian Schmidt, Roma Thamm, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Thomas Ziese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Necessity and Ways to Develop Care Goals for the Health System in Germany - a Position Paper of the DNVF].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas ReitzleAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland. ReitzleL@rki.de.
Rebecca PaprottAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Francesca FärberAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christin HeidemannAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christian SchmidtAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Roma ThammAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christa Scheidt-NaveAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
Thomas ZieseAbteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut (RKI), General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous collection and analysis of health data on relevant diseases (surveillance) is at the core of public health. The surveillance enables the implementation of measures to protect the populations' health. Therefore, relevant information needs to be provided in a timely and target-group-specific manner to the respective stakeholders.A dissemination strategy supports the effective communication of results and considers three key questions: (1) "What content is relevant to the surveillance?", (2) "Who requires which information?" and (3) "How are the results disseminated to the target audience?" In this context, digitalisation allows for novel possibilities in the design of publication formats.Since 2015, diabetes surveillance has been established at the Robert Koch Institute. Within a structured process of consensus, we defined four fields of action relevant for health policy including 40 indicators. Thereafter, we developed the first publication formats in collaboration with the scientific advisory board of the project that reflected novel possibilities offered by digitalisation. In addition to articles in scientific journals, the essential formats of the first project phase comprise the report "Diabetes in Germany" and a website including interactive visualisations of results. Additional posts on Twitter and YouTube are used to increase coverage.In addition to the further development of the indicator set, the focus of the next project phase is the advancement of the dissemination towards user- and action-oriented reporting. In close exchange with the scientific advisory board, we aim to explore the requirements of the target audience and reflect them in the design of further publication formats.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPublic Health SurveillanceGermanyHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthDiabetes mellitusDisseminationHealth reportingSurveillanceTranslation

Identifiers

PMID32813075
PMCPMC7437109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.