ArticleInternational journal of public health2020
Adolescents' right to confidential health care: knowledge, attitudes and practice of pediatricians and gynecologists in the primary healthcare sector in Belgrade, Serbia.
Article in International journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Confidentiality matters! Adolescent males' views of primary care in relation to psychosocial health: a structural equation modelling approach.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesConfidential counseling is a critical condition of the healthcare quality in adolescent medicine. This study aimed at assessing knowledge, attitudes and practice of primary healthcare pediatricians and gynecologists regarding adolescents' rights to confidentiality.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 152 pediatricians and gynecologists who are employed at 13 primary healthcare centers in Belgrade, Serbia, in 2017-2018. Data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire purposefully constructed for this study. The questionnaire examined knowledge and attitudes toward adolescents' right to confidentiality as well as whether participating physicians practice confidential health care with adolescents.
resultsPhysicians scored 4 out of 7 on a knowledge scale, but they overall supported adolescents' right to confidential health care (average attitude score was 71 out of 95). On average, physicians scored 21 out of 30 on practice of confidentiality scale. Multivariate analysis showed that better knowledge and stronger positive attitudes toward duty of confidentiality were associated with consistent practice of confidential health care.
conclusionsKnowledge about adolescents' rights to confidentiality and attitudes toward keeping adolescents' information confidential influence the practice of providing confidential services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32813072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.