Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32813052›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2021

Extended stereotactic brain biopsy in suspected primary central nervous system angiitis: good diagnostic accuracy and high safety.

Veit Michael Stoecklein, Lars Kellert, Maximilian Patzig, Clemens Küpper, Armin Giese, Viktoria Ruf, Jonathan Weller, Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth, Florian Schöberl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veit Michael StoeckleinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars KellertDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr.15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian PatzigDepartment of Neuroradiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clemens KüpperDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr.15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Armin GieseCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Viktoria RufCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jonathan WellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Friedrich-Wilhelm KrethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian SchöberlDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr.15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Florian-Schoeberl@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8183-8133
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of extended stereotactic brain biopsy (ESBB) in a single center cohort with suspected primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS).

methodsA standardized stereotactic biopsy targeting MRI-positive lesions and collecting samples from the meninges and the cortex as well as from the white matter was performed in 23 patients with clinically suspected PACNS between 2010 and 2017. The relationship between biopsy yield and clinical characteristics, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, MR-imaging, time point of biopsy and exact localization of biopsy as well as number of tissue samples were examined.

resultsPACNS was confirmed in 7 of 23 patients (30.4%). Alternative diagnoses were identified in 7 patients (30%). A shorter time period between the onset or worsening of symptoms (p = 0.018) and ESBB significantly increased the diagnostic yield. We observed only minor and transient postoperative complications in 3 patients (13.0%). ESBB led to a direct change of the therapeutic regime in 13 of 23 patients (56.5%). Careful neuropathological analysis furthermore revealed that cortical samples were crucial in obtaining a diagnosis.

conclusionESBB is a safe approach with good feasibility, even in critically ill patients, and high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected PACNS changing future therapies in 13 of 23 patients (56.5%). Early biopsy after symptom onset/worsening is crucial and (sub)acute MRI-lesions should be targeted with a particular need for biopsy samples from the cortical layer.

Indexed as

BrainVasculitis, Central Nervous SystemBiopsyCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain biopsyCerebral vasculitisImage-guided neurosurgeryPrimary angiitis of the central nervous systemStereotactic neurosurgeryStroke

Identifiers

PMID32813052
PMCPMC7815620
OpenAlexW3064152750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.