Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812918›Full record

ArticleMetabolism open2020

A pilot study of the feasibility of empagliflozin in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

John M Wentworth, Spiros Fourlanos, Peter G Colman, Leonard C Harrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M WentworthRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Australia.
Spiros FourlanosRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Australia.
Peter G ColmanRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Australia.
Leonard C HarrisonRoyal Melbourne Hospital Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSodium-glucose linked transporter (SGLT) inhibitors could improve glycaemia and simplify insulin regimens in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D), provided they were well-tolerated and safe. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of a SGLT inhibitor for the treatment of recent-onset T1D.

methodAn open label, prospective pilot study in adults with recent-onset T1D was performed. Empagliflozin, 25 mg orally daily, was given in combination with insulin and multidisciplinary care during a 24-week treatment phase, followed by wash-out visits at weeks 30 and 36.

resultsFourteen participants (4 women; median age 26 years) began and 13 completed the study. No treatment-emergent serious adverse events were observed, with fatigue and genital infection the most common side-effects. Four participants stopped mealtime insulin for at least one month when taking empagliflozin. At week 24, median weight, HbA1c and insulin dose decreased by 4.4 kg, 1.5% (17 mmol/mol) and 0.03 units/kg/day, respectively. Meal-stimulated C-peptide was maintained during the treatment phase and then decreased at 36 weeks.

conclusionsTreatment of adults with empagliflozin within 100 days of T1D diagnosis appeared safe and was associated with improved clinical outcomes. These findings justify a definitive trial to determine if SGLT inhibitors simplify treatment regimens and improve clinical outcomes in recent-onset T1D. REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000016336.

Indexed as

Beta-cell functionClinical trialFeasibility studySGLT-2 inhibitorType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32812918
PMCPMC7424822
OpenAlexW3000458733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.