Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812884›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of the Potential of Using the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire to Prepare for Diabetes Care Meetings: Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study.

Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, Unn-Britt Johansson, Ebba Linder, Janeth Leksell

Open access · goldAbstract readInterview
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Expectations of generation Y for digital health innovations].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katarina Eeg-OlofssonSahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-4707
Unn-Britt JohanssonSophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3309-136X
Ebba LinderCenter of Registers Västra Götaland, Nationella Diabetesregistret, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-9610
Janeth LeksellSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8682-2045
Dalarna University · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SESophiahemmet University College · SEThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn effective diabetes management, it is important that providers and health care systems prioritize the delivery of patient-centered care and that they are respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences and barriers.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to conduct focus group interviews to capture patients' and health care professionals' perceptions and attitudes regarding digital technology and to explore how the digital Diabetes Questionnaire can be used to support patient participation in diabetes care, as a basis for an implementation study.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted with six focus group discussions with diabetes specialist nurses and medical doctors (n=29) and four focus group discussions with individuals with diabetes (n=23). A semistructured focus group interview guide was developed, including probing questions. The data were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative content analysis was performed using an inductive approach.

resultsTwo main categories were revealed by the qualitative analysis: perceptions of digital technology and the digital questionnaire in diabetes management and care and perceptions of participation in diabetes care. An overarching theme that emerged from the focus group interviews was patients' and professionals' involvement in diabetes care using digital tools.

conclusionsThe analysis identified important factors to consider when introducing the digital Diabetes Questionnaire in clinical use. Both professionals and patients need support and training in the practical implementation of the digital questionnaire, as well as the opportunity to provide feedback on the questionnaire answers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdiabetes careDigital questionnaireeHealthfocus group interviewhealth care professionalsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32812884
PMCPMC7468633
OpenAlexW3024972995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.