Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812842›Full record

ArticleWorkplace health & safety2021

"Not a Woman-Question, But a Power-Question": A Qualitative Study of Third Parties on Psychological Violence in Academic Medicine.

Dr Heidi Siller, Claudia Beck-Rabanser, Prof Dr Margarethe Hochleitner, Dr Silvia Exenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Workplace health & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dr Heidi SillerGender Medicine & Diversity Unit.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-6957
Claudia Beck-RabanserGender Medicine & Diversity Unit.
Prof Dr Margarethe HochleitnerGender Medicine & Diversity Unit.
Dr Silvia ExenbergerUniversity Hospital for Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-3058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological violence is a persistent issue in academic medicine and affects the health and safety of health care workers. This violence is also debated as part of medical culture. Third parties, persons learning about violations after it happened, may provide an understanding of the interplay between gender and psychological violence. Perspectives on research on psychological violence in academic medicine are currently lacking.

methodsIn this qualitative exploratory study, interviews were conducted with women from a working group on equal treatment at one medical university in Austria. This group monitors discrimination and harassment and consists of medical doctors, natural scientists, administrative staff, and students. To recruit participants, an email invitation was sent to members of the working group. Of 20 eligible persons, 12 women participated. After written consent from participants, individual interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed with grounded theory.

findingsParticipants described a firm organizational culture with persistent, historically grown gendered structures. Potential threat of psychological violence affected mostly "weaker," less powerful persons, and often women. Descriptions of violence indicated harm to those affected, but intent to harm was doubted. Interventions strengthened the individual, but some participants demanded collective responsibility. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Few descriptions could be classified as psychological violence. Findings indicated a need to change organizational cultures where lower positions pose a potential threat to experiencing harm. Occupational health practice should include training in sensitization to psychological violence, protection of those targeted, deconstructing power accumulation, and promoting diversity in career patterns and working styles.

Indexed as

Power, PsychologicalSexual HarassmentAustriaFemaleHumansMaleOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchSchools, MedicalSexismViolenceWorkplaceacademic medicinegenderpowerpsychological violence in the workplace

Identifiers

PMID32812842
PMCPMC7739110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.