ReviewKorean circulation journal2020
Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Lumen-Stent Mismatch Affects Long-Term Strut Healing After Primary PCI of Left Main Lesions: An Exploratory Follow-Up OCT Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stent Thrombosis: A Narrative Review From Pathophysiology to Therapy.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Coronary Intravascular Imaging: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Causes of Acute and Non-Acute Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes: The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Intravascular imaging for acute coronary syndrome.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Constructed Based on Patient Plaque and Clinical Features for Predicting Stent Malapposition: A Retrospective Study.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Is There an Advantage of Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents over Second- and Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Comparative Clinical Implications of Calcified versus Non-Calcified Tissue Protrusion After Coronary Stent Implantation.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Previous pathologic, intravascular imaging, and clinical studies have investigated the association between adverse cardiac events and stent malapposition, including acute stent malapposition (ASM, that is detected at index procedure) and late stent malapposition (LSM, that is detected during follow-up) that can be further classified into late-persistent stent malapposition (LPSM, ASM that remains at follow-up) or late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM, newly developed stent malapposition at follow-up that was not present immediately after index stent implantation). ASM has not been associated with adverse cardiac events compared with non-ASM, even in lesions with large-sized malapposition. The clinical outcomes of LSM may depend on its subtype. The recent intravascular ultrasound studies with long-term follow-up have consistently demonstrated that LASM steadily increased the risk of thrombotic events in patients with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). This association has not yet been identified in LPSM. Accordingly, it is reasonable that approaches to stent malapposition should be based on its relationship with clinical outcomes. ASM may be tolerable after successful stent implantation, whereas prolonged anti-thrombotic medications and/or percutaneous interventions to modify LASM may be considered in selected patients with first-generation DESs. However, these treatments are still questionable due to lack of firm evidences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.