Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812396›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2020

Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke.

Li Yang, Qinqin Liu, Qiuli Zhao, Xuemei Zhu, Ling Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li YangSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qinqin LiuSchool of Nursing, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-4341
Qiuli ZhaoSchool of Nursing, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuemei ZhuSchool of Nursing, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ling WangSchool of Nursing, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences 17YJCZH213National Natural Science Foundation of China 71704038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset-to-door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset-to-door time < 3 hr) and prehospital delay (onset-to-door time ≥ 3 hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models.

resultsA total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800-0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013-0.015).

conclusionsMachine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEmergency Medical ServicesIschemic StrokeStrokeBayes TheoremHumansLogistic ModelsMachine Learningacute ischemic strokeBayesian networkmachine learningprehospital delaysupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID32812396
PMCPMC7559608
OpenAlexW3080007412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.