ArticleBrain and behavior2020
Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for analysing CT brain scans in people with a suspected acute stroke: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of Early Hospital Admission (≤24 Hours) After Stroke Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Multicenter Study From China.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Status and influencing factors of pre-hospital delay in young and middle-aged Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Utilising artificial intelligence in prehospital emergency care systems in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in prehospital emergency care systems in low- and middle-income countries: cure or curiosity? Insights from a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.iScience · 2023Article
- Explainable machine learning for long-term outcome prediction in two-center stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Identification of high-risk factors for prehospital delay for patients with stroke using the risk matrix methods.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset-to-door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset-to-door time < 3 hr) and prehospital delay (onset-to-door time ≥ 3 hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models.
resultsA total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800-0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013-0.015).
conclusionsMachine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.